Another possibility:
https://webgis.usc.edu/Default.aspx

Charles Dingman
Greenbelt, MD 20770


On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Sean Gorman <[email protected]>wrote:

> Yeah this causes all sorts of weirdness although my understanding is the
> legal terms flow from the street providers i.e. Teleatlas and Navteq.  For
> instance when talking to Navteq about POI data we could not show it on
> Google maps because they use Teleatlas.  Hence Yahoo using OSM and Google's
> MapMaker ????
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On Jul 16, 2009, at 8:41 PM, Christopher Schmidt <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>  On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:16:50AM +1000, pamela fox wrote:
>>
>>> FYI - there is still a cap. It's not currently enforced the same way it
>>> would on a normal server, but it will be in the future. So you should
>>> still
>>> code with it in mind.
>>> Keep in mind also that Google geocodes can only be used in conjunction
>>> with
>>> a Google map, per the terms of use.
>>>
>>
>> The same is true of Yahoo! Geocodes and Yahoo! maps, afaik. (I guess
>> this means that it's a violation of the terms of use to do anything
>> other than compare them visually, since looking at the numbers wouldn't
>> be 'using them with a google map'...)
>>
>> -- Chris
>>
>>  On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Andrew Johnson <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Oh, one other interesting thing I found about Google's geo-coder - if
>>>> you
>>>> run the geo-coding job from App Engine, there doesn't seem to be a limit
>>>> on
>>>> how many geo-codes you can do per day, despite the stated cap.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Andrew Johnson <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  For a while, I was geo-coding every address on CraigsList housing ads
>>>>> for
>>>>> a map mash-up.
>>>>>
>>>>> I tested all the geocoders included in Geo.py:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-announce-list/2006-October/005297.html
>>>>> .
>>>>> This includes geocoder.us.
>>>>>
>>>>> I found that the only one that did the job even remotely reliably was
>>>>> Google, followed by Yahoo. Geocoder.us didn't seem to code very many
>>>>> addresses at all.
>>>>>
>>>>> The addresses people list on CraigsList on often very vague, so maybe
>>>>> this
>>>>> isn't a good test of the geo-coders, but I found Google was the only
>>>>> really
>>>>> good one. I guess there's some chance I wasn't using the others
>>>>> properly as
>>>>> well.
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrew
>>>>> Co-founder, TrailBehind.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Andrew Turner <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Christopher Schmidt wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 02:36:47PM -0400, Sean Gorman wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Fernando -
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The geocoder we just open sourced has address parsing in it that could
>>>>>> do the job:
>>>>>> http://github.com/geocommons/geocoder/tree/master
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which may well be similar to:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  http://search.cpan.org/~sderle/Geo-StreetAddress-US-0.99/US.pm <
>>>>>> http://search.cpan.org/%7Esderle/Geo-StreetAddress-US-0.99/US.pm>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (Which is the code from geocoder.us.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> bigger, better, faster, and now with more peanut butter (as the glue).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The goal is to extend parsers, and data importers for various
>>>>>> countries'
>>>>>> addressing schemes and data sources (esp. OpenStreetMap).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andrew
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Geowanking mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Geowanking mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>> Geowanking mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Christopher Schmidt
>> MetaCarta
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geowanking mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org
>
_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org

Reply via email to