>  What does
> cost to have to constantly maintain, correct and be legally
> responsible for the accuracy of the base-maps? What is the cost of
> manufacturing enthusiast volunteer participation? What comes at a
> lower cost of investment via voluntary community collaboration?

The OSMCP project at USGS is trying to directly answer some of these
questions. See:
http://navigator.er.usgs.gov

An Open File Report is due out real soon now describing the results of
the first phase of the OSMCP. We are starting to compile data from the
second phase where we are more directly comparing volunteer-sourced
data (and quality control) to in-house processes. Real bean-counting
stuff.

> to your proprietary dataset.  When Jo Walsh first suggested community
> self-mapping a decade ago she did it with some derision - that it
> wasn't feasible. At the time it wasn't - we were not trained that way.

In 1994, Nancy Tosta wrote in Geo Info Systems about community
mapping. The problem, at least within the context of authoritarian
mapping (like at the USGS), isn't the technical aspects. The problem
is more how to make community map data "authoritative". The USGS has
had a string of volunteer map projects dating back to the 90s when
Tosta was there. All of them ran into the problem that the cost of
making  community-generated data authoritative was too costly. To be
honest, the USGS doesn't actually have a well-defined process or cost
model for making data generated by other means "authoritative" short
of government actually doing the survey.

> I'm happy to chair a session on this topic next week anyway if folks wish.

Unfortunately, I won't be in California next week. But Greg Matthews
should be at Where 2.0 and (hopefully) WhereCamp. I emailed him to see
if he would join your panel.

-Eric

_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org

Reply via email to