When will it ship on google?

Steve

> On Oct 29, 2014, at 3:47 PM, Doug Rinckes <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Steve,
> 
> The reasons we've open sourced it before implementing it are that we didn't 
> want to end up having to support something that only 10 people use. We also 
> didn't want to rely on the fact it worked on Google maps - we want it to be 
> used if it's good, not just because of who it came from. TBH, if someone else 
> supports it before Google maps does, I'd be stoked!
> 
> 
> 
> Doug
> 
>> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Steve Coast <[email protected]> wrote:
>> The interesting thing about w3w is they have funding. The world already has 
>> lots of location code systems, the problem is that nobody uses them. Maybe 
>> funding will help.
>> 
>> This Google system I'm sure is mathematically elegant but it looks like 
>> google isn't actually using it. Being open source isn't enough, if it was 
>> open and used across google then it'd be a de facto standard.
>> 
>> Steve
>> 
>>> On Oct 29, 2014, at 3:29 PM, David Blackman <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Remind me a bit of http://what3words.com/
>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Doug Rinckes <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Hello geowankers
>>>> 
>>>> I'm an engineer at Google, and I have just open sourced a geo project 
>>>> we've been working on for a while.
>>>> 
>>>> I used to work on our maps, detecting missing road networks and in my 
>>>> spare time mapping roads in Papua New Guinea, Central and West Africa from 
>>>> the satellite imagery. But without street names or addresses, a road 
>>>> network isn't all that useful. People can't use it for directions, because 
>>>> they can't express where they want directions to. After talking with 
>>>> colleagues from around the world, I discovered that's it actually very 
>>>> common for streets to be unnamed. That means that we can't get the names 
>>>> from government agencies, streetview or user edits - because there are no 
>>>> names to get.
>>>> 
>>>> We thought that we should provide short codes that could be used like 
>>>> addresses, to give the location of homes, businesses, anything. If we made 
>>>> them usable from smartphones, we can make addresses for anywhere available 
>>>> to anyone with a smartphone pretty much immediately.
>>>> 
>>>> We had some specific requirements, including that these address codes 
>>>> should work offline, they shouldn't spell words or include easily confused 
>>>> characters. We wanted to be able to look at two codes and tell if they are 
>>>> near each other, and estimate the direction and even the distance. The 
>>>> codes should not be generated by a single provider, because what do you do 
>>>> when they disappear? Finally, it had to be open sourced.
>>>> 
>>>> Open sourcing the project was important. We wanted to allow everyone to 
>>>> evaluate it so that we don't go implementing something that turns out to 
>>>> not be useful. If it does turn out to be useful, everyone (including other 
>>>> mapping providers) should be able to implement it and use the codes freely.
>>>> 
>>>> I'm pre-announcing this to a couple of geo lists today, and I'll be 
>>>> sticking around for comments and questions. The following links provide 
>>>> more information:
>>>> 
>>>> Github project: https://github.com/google/open-location-code
>>>> Demonstration website: http://plus.codes
>>>> Discussion list: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/open-location-code
>>>> 
>>>> Enjoy!
>>>> 
>>>> Doug
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Geowanking mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Geowanking mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org
> 
_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org

Reply via email to