Starting at whatever level, and then expanding in the direction of the
questions makes a lot of sense.

On 8/30/06, Darryl Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree entirely. That was just a very quick example off the top of my head.
Ideally, it would be an introduction from the base level thru to the nerd level 
we like :-)

definition of latitude/longitude
 -
different map standards
 -
 -equations to convert between different mapping standards
 -code -perl
       -C
       -java
       -shell script
       -awk

what is geocoding
 -
etc

Generally speaking, I'd imagine we'd probably start at the nerd level and work 
back when people asked questions that we thought were obvious :-)


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rich Gibson
Sent: Thursday, 31 August 2006 2:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Geowanking] Geospatial Library Catalog


Hi Darryl,

I'd love it if it included a hire level of abstraction.  Like
'Generating a waypoint' is a good pattern, but it is a sub pattern of
the more general patterns of 'tracking your position' or 'marking
points of interest' or some such.

A lot of folks, speaking from personal experience, are starting way
before what a lot of us now consider 'baseline.'

Cheers,
Rich

On 8/30/06, Darryl Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rather than being language focused, I'd prefer to see it 'task' focused, with 
code in a variety of languages
> i.e.
> generate waypoint in GPX format
>      -algorithms/maths
>      -perl code
>      -c code
>      -c++ code
>      -java
>      -javascript
>
> generate waypoint in google earth (kml) format
>      -algorithms/maths
>      -perl code
>      -c code
>      -c++ code
>      -java
>      -javascript
>
> etc.
> That way it might encourage people to port ideas to other languages if the 
basics are down.
>
> Just my 2 cents
>
> Darryl.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrew Turner
> Sent: Thursday, 31 August 2006 5:58 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Geowanking] Geospatial Library Catalog
>
>
> On 8/30/06, Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 30 Aug 2006, at 19:26, Andy Armstrong wrote:
> > >
> > > Since then I've slightly lost track of the flow of the discussion.
> > > Is anyone still interested in doing /that/ (and for now /just/
> > > that)? :)
>
> Sorry for derailing your original topic - I've 'forked it'
>
> > Oh, and further to that I'm in the process of getting control of
> > Geo::Gpx (although it'd be better if it were called Geo::GPX) which
> > is currently incomplete with a view to fleshing it out as a complete
> > general purpose GPX parser / generator. Next up I plan to visit
>
> My point for jumping is was there there is a lot of details you're
> looking up, making into algorithms, etc. So what I'd like to do would
> be to either find comparable libraries for what you're adding, or
> develop them in parallel (more like delayed). Maybe keep with a
> similar interface, and arch for the simple tools so that maintaining
> them across languages is easy and documentation/references can be
> consistent.
>
> Andrew
>
>
> --
> Andrew Turner
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]        42.4266N x 83.4931W
> http://highearthorbit.com              Northville, Michigan, USA
> _______________________________________________
> Geowanking mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
>
> ==============================================================================
> The information contained in this email and any attachment is confidential and
> may contain legally privileged or copyright material.   It is intended only 
for
> the use of the addressee(s).  If you are not the intended recipient of this
> email, you are not permitted to disseminate, distribute or copy this email or
> any attachments.  If you have received this message in error, please notify 
the
> sender immediately and delete this email from your system.  The ABC does not
> represent or warrant that this transmission is secure or virus free.   Before
> opening any attachment you should check for viruses.  The ABC's liability is
> limited to resupplying any email and attachments
> ==============================================================================
> _______________________________________________
> Geowanking mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
>


--
Rich Gibson
Chief Scientist, Locative Technologies
http://mappinghacks.com
http://geocoder.us
http://testingrange.com
AIM period3equals
_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking

==============================================================================
The information contained in this email and any attachment is confidential and
may contain legally privileged or copyright material.   It is intended only for
the use of the addressee(s).  If you are not the intended recipient of this
email, you are not permitted to disseminate, distribute or copy this email or
any attachments.  If you have received this message in error, please notify the
sender immediately and delete this email from your system.  The ABC does not
represent or warrant that this transmission is secure or virus free.   Before
opening any attachment you should check for viruses.  The ABC's liability is
limited to resupplying any email and attachments
==============================================================================
_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking



--
Rich Gibson
Chief Scientist, Locative Technologies
http://mappinghacks.com
http://geocoder.us
http://testingrange.com
AIM period3equals
_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking

Reply via email to