Jo Walsh wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 09:44:27AM +0100, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Osmarender
Yes, I'd second that. Osmarender is stupidly impressive and the one
part of OSM that's currently producing n00b-friendly output.
Having learnt a little bit by osmosis about how the SLD, Styled Layer
Description standard works (still reluctant to plough through the
OGC specification wordmire and finding the geotools API/tutorial docs
a lot easier on the eyes - cf http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Styles )
There's a close fit between Osmarender and SLD, to the extent that
one could be XLST transformable into the other. Which would rock.
I definitely agree that would rock. SLD is a pretty good standard, and
does more or less the same thing as osmarender - defines rules for how
to style content. We have another decent introduction in the GeoServer
docs: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOSDOC/SLD+Intro+Tutorial
best regards,
Chris
--
Chris Holmes
The Open Planning Project
http://topp.openplans.org
begin:vcard
fn:Chris Holmes
n:Holmes;Chris
org:The Open Planning Project
adr:;;377 Broadway, 11th Floor;New York;NY;10013;USA
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:VP, Strategic Development
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://topp.openplans.org
version:2.1
end:vcard
_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
