Norman,
Haven't finished a response to this (traveling as well). I wanted to
say that the "engine" of Geonetworks is quite different from that of
ebxmlrr, but we have discussed whether something like ebxmlrr could
be used as the Geonetwork persistence mechanism. I don't think a
conclusion has been reached yet, but interest continues.
Cheers,
Josh
On Mar 9, 2007, at 4:57 AM, Norman Barker wrote:
Hi,
After I have published an invitation to an IRC chat late next week
(I am flying to Boulder for work tomorrow), I will move this thread
to the ebxmlrr forum. I thought this would stimulate more debate,
but the responses I have had back so far have been of a high
quality. Peter Vretanos from CubeWerx has provided a lot of sample
queries from his work, and a study on how to map capabilities
documents which will make a good start. There is also a lot of
interest from ebxmlrr.
I will publish an agenda, and a straw man approach next week to
this list, and then we will move off.
Though I like other catalog efforts, and welcome the opportunity to
move any project under their umbrella, I think perhaps ebxmlrr is a
major architecture change as opposed to GeoNetwork and they don't
just fit - but hey, tell me if you think differently.
Norman
On 3/8/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Norman / Josh,
Perhaps GeoNetwork could be extended (if they're not already
working on it)?
http://geonetwork-opensource.org/technical_spec/document_view
Bruce
---------------------------------------
Bruce Bannerman
IT Solutions Architect - GIS
Department of Primary Industries - Australia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08/03/2007 11:00 PM
Please respond to
[email protected]
To
[email protected]
cc
Subject
Geowanking Digest, Vol 40, Issue 7
3. ebrim FUD (Norman Barker)
4. Re: ebrim FUD (Joshua Lieberman)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 10:27:49 +0000
From: "Norman Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Geowanking] ebrim FUD
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hi,
as I am not aware of any open source ebrim catalog profiles of CSW I
thought I would have a go with ebxmlrr (omar). I am part of the OSGEO
geodata group, and as part of this I wrote the spatial hibernate
components for PostGIS, and the spatial dialect that allows spatial
(adhoc :-) ) queries.
I have put full details on how to set up Postgresql and Omar (ebxmlrr)
the open source OASIS ebxml reference registry are available here
http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Deploy/container/JBoss
and we have started an OGC page here
http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Community/ogc
I am not advocating either the ebrim or the RESTful approach, but I
know it is useful to have an implementation that we can all evaluate -
and hence make meaningful comments on.
Any experiences, advice then please send them my way.
I have sent this to geow*nking since this is where the real
thinkers are!
thanks,
Norman
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 05:56:18 -0500
From: Joshua Lieberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Geowanking] ebrim FUD
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Norman,
There are certainly a number of people interested in an open-source
CSW / ebRIM implementation, since there are open-source +/- reference
implementations of most other OGC service specifications. Of course,
ebxmlrr is based not only on the ebRIM information (meta)model, but
also on the ebRS registry service, which has substantial differences
from CS/W and includes a repository interface which doesn't really
exist in the CS/W profile.
That opens several questions as to the best / simplest approach for
implementing a CS/W with this software. Do have a particular strategy
in mind at this point? Perhaps something like an IRC chat could be
arranged to discuss this in the next week or so.
Cheers,
Josh Lieberman
On Mar 8, 2007, at 5:27 AM, Norman Barker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as I am not aware of any open source ebrim catalog profiles of CSW I
> thought I would have a go with ebxmlrr (omar). I am part of the
OSGEO
> geodata group, and as part of this I wrote the spatial hibernate
> components for PostGIS, and the spatial dialect that allows spatial
> (adhoc :-) ) queries.
>
> I have put full details on how to set up Postgresql and Omar
(ebxmlrr)
> the open source OASIS ebxml reference registry are available here
>
> http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Deploy/container/JBoss
>
> and we have started an OGC page here
>
> http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Community/ogc
>
> I am not advocating either the ebrim or the RESTful approach, but I
> know it is useful to have an implementation that we can all
evaluate -
> and hence make meaningful comments on.
>
> Any experiences, advice then please send them my way.
>
> I have sent this to geow*nking since this is where the real
> thinkers are!
>
> thanks,
>
> Norman
> _______________________________________________
> Geowanking mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
End of Geowanking Digest, Vol 40, Issue 7
*****************************************
_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
