When Eclipse was released by IBM I would imagine life got very difficult
for the people selling proprietary Java IDEs. 

Let's just say for the sake of discussion that all those other people
shriveled up, and Eclipse was the only thing left. Would it matter then
how IBM managed Eclipse? Would it then become important that IBM might
not be a good open source citizen? Would it not matter because
developers could always fork the code an move on without IBM?

I'm not saying this would ever happen. I'm just providing a hypothetical
example. What do you think? Does the ability to fork code mean that the
behavior or the company managing an open source project becomes
irrelevant?

The Sunburned Surveyor


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gregor J.
Rothfuss
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 12:49 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Geowanking] Measuring Open Source Citenzenship -
Reconsidering

Landon Blake wrote:

> I had never before considered that a company might release source code
> under an open source license as a way to harm a competitor. That got
me
> to thinking, what motivates companies to release code under an open
> source license? After a company does so, what makes it an ethical
member
> of the open source community? Is source code like drug money? Can it
be
> tainted if depending on the source?

increasing competition by releasing open source software is a good thing

and has nothing to do with ethics.
_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking


Warning:
Information provided via electronic media is not guaranteed against defects 
including translation and transmission errors. If the reader is not the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you 
have received this information in error, please notify the sender immediately.
_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking

Reply via email to