On 10/08/07, Mateusz Loskot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Artem Pavlenko wrote:
> > Oh yes, looking through your code:
> >
> > POINT EMPTY  :D
> >
> > Why not just
> >
> > POINT
> >
> > What's wrong with OGC?
>
> The data is constructed with TAG TEXT pair.
> So, may be the EMPTY is here for consistency (TEXT is not empty).
>
> Anyway, there are more potential problems still unresolved,
> for instance:
>
> http://feature.opengeospatial.org/forumbb/viewtopic.php?t=325
>
> (I've not got any confirmation to my questions here, except the one from
> creed user, so I have no idea if they have been considered by the board or
> not).
>

I can see the problem with your e-mail heading..

".. I'm Mateusz, I live in Poland and I'm a GIS software developer.."

You should've written :

"Hi, Jack Dangermond is here. Could you verify WKT EBNF grammar .. "



> Cheers
> --
> Mateusz Loskot
> http://mateusz.loskot.net
> _______________________________________________
> Geowanking mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
>
_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking

Reply via email to