Sorry, good (fuzziness and all) boundary data trumps "what neighborhood is (long,lat) in?". Only question now is whether the Zillow data is any good. I'd still rather see people contribute neighborhood boundaries to OpenStreetMap or something like it.
Sean Ian White wrote: > Yeah for a company with $60m in financing looking for something to > do!!!! > > Last week we announced availability of free hoods on demand via our API. > No, it's not REST, no you don't get boundaries, but what do you want for > a company that actually makes money? We also have 2x+ the coverage of > Zillow's offer and it's probably better for some of what the geowanking > crowd (ahem, Anselm?) was asking for: http://urbanmapping.com/freehoods > > > > > Ian White :: Urban Mapping, Inc. > 690 Fifth Street Suite 200 :: San Francisco CA 94107 > T415.946.8170 :: F866.385.8266 :: urbanmapping.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bender, Phil > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 8:07 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Geowanking] Zillow has released boundaries for "neighborhoods" > inthe US > > > Thanks to Spatially Adjusted via the All Points Blog for letting us know > that Zillow has made its US neighborhood boundaries available under CC > license: http://www.zillow.com/labs/NeighborhoodBoundaries.htm > > _______________________________________________ > Geowanking mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking > _______________________________________________ > Geowanking mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking > _______________________________________________ Geowanking mailing list [email protected] http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
