On 13/06/2008, at 5:02 AM, R E Sieber wrote:
> Frankly, I find their winning entries uninspiring in terms of new  
> technologies


Imagine you're there with them, and you are trying to convey that to  
them. They're all excited and impressed by their technology, and  
you're sitting there saying "it's really not that good". What kind of  
reaction do you think you'd get, and do you think that people would be  
listening to you?

I am sitting here with the same opinion about the stuff that is being  
done here. I frankly just find any of this GIS, Twitter, and overlay  
maps stuff to be derivative, uninspiring and wish that we could come  
up with something better with the new resources that we all have  
compared to the 1960's.

The reaction that I get from expressing this viewpoint in here is the  
same as you would get for expressing your opinion at the NSF. We're  
both right, and it gets both of us nowhere (despite being all about  
finding where!).

The challenge is to stop piddling around with yet another mashup, and  
to start considering some of the wider questions that apply to  
efficiency of collaboration, to boost our capability to create new  
things.

While we are unaugmented, the solutions that we can think of will  
always be limited by our limitations.

--
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking

Reply via email to