Apologies for cross-posting----


The Transformation of Global Climate Governance: Assessing Architecture, Agency 
and Accountability



Dear Colleagues,



We invite paper proposals for our workshop on "The Transformation of Global 
Climate Governance: Assessing Architecture, Agency and Accountability". 
Deadline for submission of abstracts is 1 December 2010. For more information 
on the theme of our workshop, please see below.



Kind regards,



Philipp Pattberg; Email: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

Johannes Stripple; Email: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>





Theme/Focus:



A divided scholarly focus on either climate diplomacy (intergovernmental 
negotiations, the design of post 2012 treaties) or on the activities 'beyond 
the state' (partnerships, standards, epistemic communities) limits our 
possibility to conceive of a transformation of global climate governance 
understood as a totality, as a global climate governance complex. There is 
furthermore a need to bring in adaptation as a specific concern and object of 
global governance.



This ECPR workshop consequently focuses on a broader transformation, which we 
conceptualize by analyzing a number of profound trends in global climate 
governance.



1.     Commodification and financialization

Carbon markets have emerged as the major response to climate change and are 
increasingly being entrenched around the world, but much more research is 
needed into how carbon is, and has been, turned into a commodity and/or 
currency and the implications of this trend. We need to better situate and link 
the carbon economy to global climate governance as well as pay attention to 
emerging subjectivities around climate change and carbon.



2.     Fragmentation and deterritorialisation

The de-ter­ritorialization of climate governance (the process of regulating 
carbon emissions be­yond national territories and state sovereignty). Whereas 
the international 'targets-and-timetables' approach of the Kyoto Protocol is 
based on national emission reduction targets, within the transnational arena a 
host of ambitious emission re­duction schemes have emerged that are not longer 
bound to nation-states and their claim to sover­eignty. These novel forms of 
de-territorialized climate govern­ance are substan­tially under-re­searched, in 
particular when it comes to their functional interlinkages with the 
international regime.



3.  Hybridization

The hybridization of cli­mate governance (the process of involving private 
actors in climate change politics). Global climate governance is based on the 
activi­ties of governments and international organisations, but increasingly 
in­cludes insti­tu­tional arrangements that are not purely public, but of a 
rather hybrid na­ture. These ar­rangements might include public actors, but 
often attempt to govern cli­mate change be­yond the state, deliberately 
ex­cluding public actors. These hybrid forms of govern­ance are in­sufficiently 
under­stood, in particular when it comes to their real-world impacts and 
broader implications for our under­standing of key social science con­cepts 
such democratic legitimacy and ac­countabil­ity.


This ECPR workshop starts from three distinct analytical perspectives to 
investi­gate the current state of global climate governance transformations: 
agency, architecture and accountability.

Agency, understood as the capacity of collectives to change the course of 
events or the outcome of processes, is in­creasingly located in sites beyond 
the state and its interna­tional organi­zations. A number of collectives 
deliber­ately form social institutions to address the problem of cli­mate 
change without being forced, persuaded or funded by states and other public 
agencies. There is both a need for more research on what kind of agency 
non-state collectives possess, but also what kind of responsibility that might 
follow from being an agent.
Consequently, we invite papers that investigate a) how different collectives 
(states, NGOs, firms, IGOs etc) possess agency in global climate governance and 
how that agency is constructed and contested; b) what impacts and measurable 
effects agency has in global climate governance; c) how agency beyond the state 
is linked to international and national governance attempts; d) how we can 
conceive of the moral agency of states as well as other collectives

Architec­ture can be understood as the interlocking web of prin­ciples, 
institutions and practices that shape decisions by stake­holders at all 
lev­els. Most research has hitherto been focused on single institu­tions 
(pre­domi­nantly at the inter-state level). As a result, we today possess a 
fairly good under­standing of the determinants of institutional effec­tiveness. 
In comparison, how­ever, the effec­tive­ness of the overall institu­tional 
structure including the many non-state governance arrangements remains much 
less under­stood.
We invite papers that investigate the overall global climate governance 
complex, the norms and rules it embodies as well as the linkages with other 
international governance arenas. Questions of architecture can be addressed 
both with regards to mitigation and adaptation.

Accountability as a concept refers to a more or less co­herent set of rules and 
proce­dures, de­lineating who takes part in decision-making, who holds whom 
re­spon­sible for what kind of actions, and by which means. Accountability 
furthermore has an internal as well as external dimension and both are highly 
relevant for climate governance beyond the state.
We invite papers that investigate the novel mechanism through which 
accountability of global climate governance is constructed and contested in the 
realm of climate change governance.


The workshop aims to make two contributions: first, it provides a coherent and 
theory-based analysis of the global climate governance complex; second, it 
advances our theoretical and conceptual understanding of agency, architecture 
and accountability. We invite both empirical and normative papers that deal 
with either mitigation, adaptation or both.

We plan to publish the results of our workshop as an edited volume (either with 
ECPR-Routledge Series in European Political Science or, alternatively, with the 
MIT Series on Earth System Governance).

More information on our workshop can be found here:
http://www.ecprnet.eu/joint_sessions/st_gallen/workshop_details.asp?workshopID=17

A full outline can be found here:
http://www.ecprnet.eu/joint_sessions/st_gallen/documents/outlines/17.pdf

For general information about the ECPR Joint Sessions (including funding 
opportunities, please visit: 
http://www.ecprnet.eu/joint_sessions/st_gallen/default.asp).

Important note: participation of scholars from non-ECPR institutions is 
limited.  Please note that non-ECPR members are required to pay a conference 
fee of £300 and they will be invoiced accordingly by ECPR Central Services in 
advance of the Joint Sessions.

Philipp Pattberg and Johannes Stripple

Reply via email to