Geoffrey and others: All messages posted to the gep-ed list are archived at https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!forum/gep-ed and searchable by keyword and subject heading. Perhaps this can serve as something of a log, so long as folks are sure to put 'Rio' or 'Rio+20' in their subject line.
Cheers, Michael Maniates On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Geoffrey Wandesforde-Smith < [email protected]> wrote: > Let me suggest there would be value in our trying to keep a log of > post-Rio+20 analyses or assessments, such as the one by CAP, posted to > gep-ed earlier today by Michael Maniates. **** > > ** ** > > In England, while Rio+20 was in progress, I noted a very negative press > for the conference, uniformly across those British newspapers that bothered > to report on Rio+20 at all. And in three very recent online reports or > post-mortems I happen to have encountered, one posted to gep-ed by Pam > Chasek, yesterday, another contributed to the Migratory Wildlife Network > Digest by Margi Prideaux (with more to come), and a press summary from > Infosylva, there is essentially no good news.**** > > ** ** > > What happened and what, if anything, went wrong? Where might one turn for > some understanding of what the Rio+20 outcomes mean? **** > > ** ** > > Here’s the (incomplete) list I have at this point:**** > > ** ** > > *Chasek/IISD **http://www.iisd.ca/uncsd/rio20/enb/ * > > * * > > Prideaux/MWN http://wildmigration.org/newsletter.php?newsletter_select=29 > **** > > ** ** > > *Infosylva ** > http://www.fao.org/forestry/33165-092ea9bc725a616b7d7d792239690cb3b.pdf * > > * * > > James et al./CAP > http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2012/06/rio_text.html** > > I hope others will log additional items to the list as time goes by.**** > > Geoffrey.**** > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > **** > > Geoffrey Wandesforde-Smith**** > > Emeritus Professor of Political Science**** > > University of California, Davis.**** > > Associate Editor, JIWLP.**** >
