FYI. wil

Dr. Wil Burns, Associate Director
Master of Science, Energy Policy & Climate Program
Johns Hopkins University
1717 Massachusetts Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20036
650.281.9126 (Mobile)
202.452.8713 (Fax)
http://energy.jhu.edu

Skype ID: Wil.Burns
Blog: http://www.teachingclimatelaw.org

-----Original Message-----
From: David Duthie [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2012 9:34 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Ecosystem Services journal - second issue; also open access

Dear BIOPLANNERS,

I have started my end of year vacation and hope that most of you have also,
but I have one last posting to clear from my desktop.

A while ago, I posted links to the first open access issue of the new
journal "Ecosystem Services".  Now, Volume 2 has just been released and,
again, it is open access.

The short editorial and a list of the articles is posted below my signature,
whilst links to the full articles (PDF) can be accessed at:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/22120416/2
        
Best wishes to you all and your families for the New Year.


David Duthie

*********************************************

Editorial

Editorial of Volume 2

The second issue of Ecosystem Services is now in front of you, with two sets
of very interesting papers. The first set addresses a range of ecosystem
services in different ecosystems. The second set continues the survey of
ecosystem services research around the globe, addressing the state of the
concept in science, policy and practice, reporting on North America
(Jennifer Molnar and Ida Kubisewski), Latin America (Patty Balvanera and
colleagues) and Africa (Benis Egoh and colleagues).

Claire Armstrong and colleagues address the services from the deep:
steps towards valuation of deep sea goods and services. This paper addresses
a field which is rapidly attracting attention in the policy arena, but very
little work has been done so far ‘‘to identify and characterise the goods
and services of the sea, and even less for the deep sea’’. The authors
present a first description of deep- sea ecosystem goods and services, and
review the current knowl- edge, possible valuation methods, and
implementation options.

Anna Tengberg and colleagues present a conceptual analysis of cultural
ecosystem services provided by landscapes: assessment of heritage values and
identity. This paper discusses how cultural ecosystem services can be
assessed and integrated into spatial and physical planning and presents two
case studies. They demonstrate that the methods from cultural heritage
conserva- tion provide tools for the analysis of historical values as well
as historical drivers of change.

In the paper Facilitating implementation of landscape-scale water
management: the integrated constructed wetland (ICW) con- cept Mark Everard
and colleagues address measures necessary to overcome barriers to the
implementation of integrated resource management. With a case study in
County Waterford, Ireland, they show considerable local support for ICWs
reflecting multiple social, environmental and economic benefits. The
experience has generic relevance for the broader pervasion of the benefits
of ICWs across Ireland and the wider world, but also in evaluating and
implementing the efficacy of similar multi-benefit solutions.

Martin De Wit en colleagues address the issue of investment in urban natural
assets, and discuss whether this can leverage economic value in city
economies. In a combination of a partici- pation process and economic
valuation, it is conservatively estimated that for the City of Cape Town,
natural assets yield value through the tourism industry, but recreation in
parks, open spaces and beaches, as well as specific industries such as film-
making, also benefit substantially from the services provided by
well-functioning ecosystems.

In addition we present the first book review and a report of the 5th Annual
Conference of the Ecosystem Services Partnership in Portland, Oregon, this
summer. The first and second issue cover a wide field of topics, and we are
preparing to continue in some of these directions, such as mapping ecosystem
services and pay- ments for ecosystem services, next year with Special
Issues. Another future topic is the progress in implementation of the Aichi
targets of the CBD, set in
2010 in Nagoya, Japan, and evaluated in Hyderabad, India, in October
2012 during the 11th CoP of the CBD, and their spin-off at national level
across the world.

In the first week of October, the 4th International Ecosummit 2012,
‘‘Ecological sustainability, restoring the planet’s ecosystem services’’
took place in Columbus Ohio, with many plenary speak- ers and sessions and
posters dealing with ecosystem services, and the formal launching of the
inaugural issue of the journal. About 1600 participants engaged in intensive
discussions, and several potential papers for the journal were spotted. In
the next issue we shall have a summary report on this great event.

Editor-in-chief

Leon Braat

***********************************

Services from the deep: Steps towards valuation of deep sea goods and
services Claire W. Armstrong, Naomi S. Foley, Rob Tinch, Sybille van den
Hove

Very little work has been done to identify and characterise the goods and
services of the sea, and even less for the deep sea. We present a first
categorisation and synthesis of deep-sea ecosystem goods and services, and
review the current state of human knowledge about these services, the
possible methods of their valuation, and possible steps forward in its
implementation. Our conclusions highlight the nature and extent of research
that is needed to overcome the gaps in knowledge that have been identified,
and which have so far prevented the valuation of most deep-sea ecosystem
goods and services.

***********************************
        
Cultural ecosystem services provided by landscapes: Assessment of heritage
values and identity Anna Tengberg, Susanne Fredholm, Ingegard Eliasson, Igor
Knez, Katarina Saltzman, Ola Wetterberg
        
This paper aims to provide a conceptual analysis of cultural ecosystem
services and how they are linked to the concepts of landscape, heritage and
identity. It discusses how these cultural ecosystem services can be assessed
and integrated into spatial and physical planning. The paper presents two
case studies to shed light on the assessment process. A case study from
Sweden combines an analysis of ecosystem services with methods for
documenting cultural heritage values in landscapes. A second case study from
the Arafura–Timor Seas combines an analysis of cultural ecosystem services
with methods for assessment of priority environmental concerns at the
seascape scale.

We demonstrate that the methods from cultural heritage conservation provide
tools for the analysis of historical values as well as historical drivers of
change in landscapes that can add time-depth to more spatially focused
ecosystem assessments. We propose that methods for valuation of cultural
heritage and identity in landscapes are integrated into assessments of
ecosystem services to inform policy making and physical and spatial planning
for sustainable management of ecosystems and landscapes. This could also
provide an approach for bringing about integrated implementation of
conventions and instruments from the environmental and cultural heritage
fields, respectively.

**********************************

Facilitating implementation of landscape-scale water management: The
integrated constructed wetland concept
Mark Everard, Rory Harrington, Robert J. McInnes                
        
This research addressed measures necessary to overcome barriers to the
implementation of integrated resource management solutions delivering
multiple ecosystem services, using the case of the Anne Valley integrated
constructed wetlands (ICWs) in County Waterford, Ireland.
The benefits of ICWs are reviewed, and feedback from interviews with a range
of people from farming, national government and policy, business, County
Council and other perspectives, is analysed using the STEEP framework.
Whilst we acknowledge bias in interviewee selection, there is considerable
local support for ICWs reflecting multiple social, environmental and
economic benefits. Indeed, the Irish government has published design
guidance for ICWs. However, there remain disconnects between some regulatory
and other bodies, which appear to be related to their tradition of looking
at issues from a more narrow, discipline-specific perspective. These
barriers are not unique to Ireland, but representative of the areas of
cultural change necessary to enable more connected ways of thinking,
technological development and implementation and its subsequent licensing
and regulation. The experience therefore has generic relevance not merely
for the broader pervasion of the benefits of ICWs across Ireland and the
wider world, but also in evaluating and implementing the efficacy of similar
multi-benefit solutions.

************************************

Including the economic value of well-functioning urban ecosystems in
financial decisions: Evidence from a process in Cape Town Martin de Wit,
Hugo van Zyl, Doug Crookes, James Blignaut, Terence Jayiya, Valerie Goiset,
Brian Mahumani
        
Investing in urban natural assets can leverage relatively high economic
value in city economies. It is not only the case for highly developed
cities, but could also be the case for rapidly developing cities. This is
the key message from a case study for the City of Cape Town in South Africa
as presented in this paper. It was calculated that the leverage of municipal
expenditure on maintaining and enhancing ecosystems is 1.2–2 times higher
than the leverage of all municipal expenditure on the City economy.
Investing and maintaining a City's natural assets or ecological
infrastructure yields economically valuable services that could prove to be
an important driver of value addition in a city's economy. It is
conservatively estimated that for the City of Cape Town, natural assets
yield a flow of ecosystem services valued in the order of R4 billion per
annum, within a range between R2 billion and R6 billion per annum. Most of
this value for the City of Cape Town is created through the tourism
industry, but recreation in parks, open spaces and beaches, as well as
specific industries such as film-making, also benefit substantially from the
services provided by well-functioning ecosystems. Buffering services to
better cope with natural hazards such as coastal surges, flooding and fires
in urban contexts are important services from an insurance perspective. As
entities focused on service provision and as enablers of economic growth and
development, municipalities in rapidly developing urban centrums have the
mandate and must create the opportunity to invest adequately in natural
assets to maintain a healthy flow of ecosystem services to the benefit of
people living in and visiting their cities.

****************************************

Managing natural wealth: Research and implementation of ecosystem services
in the United States and Canada
Jennifer L. Molnar, Ida Kubiszewski     
        
The United States and Canada have vast stores of ecological wealth that
provide often unseen but critical benefits to the people and economy of each
country. The close ties between ecology and the economy make it urgent that
action is taken to address the risks of ecosystem degradation, but these
close ties also present opportunities to develop new incentives for
ecosystem conservation. To highlight the diversity of approaches being
implemented in the US and Canada, we describe examples of programs seeking
to maintain ecosystem services from wetlands, agricultural lands, forests,
and water quality.
Corporations are also beginning to account for ecosystem service values.
Innovative solutions are being developed mostly within existing government
and corporate policies that allow for ecosystem service accounting. To
further mainstream ecosystem service values into broader economic decisions,
new policies are necessary that not only allow but mandate their inclusion
in decisions and reporting.

***************************************

Ecosystem services research in Latin America: The state of the art Patricia
Balvanera, María Uriarte, Lucía Almeida-Leñero, Alice Altesor, Fabrice
DeClerck, Toby Gardner, Jefferson Hall, Antonio Lara, Pedro Laterra,
Marielos Peña-Claros, Dalva M. Silva Matos, Adrian L.
Vogl, Luz Piedad Romero-Duque, Luis Felipe Arreola, Ángela Piedad
Caro-Borrero, Federico Gallego, Meha Jain, Christian Little, Rafael de
Oliveira Xavier, José M. Paruelo, et al.
        
Ecosystem services science has developed at a fast rate in Latin America, a
region characterized by a high biological and cultural diversity, strong
emphasis in foreign investment, and high socioeconomic inequities. Here we
conducted the following analyses at the regional and national scales: (1)
how and when did the study of ecosystem services arise in each country?, (2)
what is our present understanding of ecosystem service supply, delivery to
societies, and social and economic values?, (3) what is the state of the art
in integrating tradeoffs among services and in using interdisciplinary
perspectives?, and (4) how has ecosystem service research been connected to
policy design or management for sustainability? A large literature review
(>1000 references) showed that in Latin America ES supply and links to
policy have been the most frequently assessed.
Overall, emphasis has been placed on a few services, namely carbon and
water. Payments for ecosystem services have received considerable attention
in the region, though with strong differences across nations and with
important limitations in their application. The future of the ecosystem
service paradigm in Latin America will largely depend on its capacity to
demonstrate effectiveness in meeting both conservation and development
goals.

****************************************

An African account of ecosystem service provision: Use, threats and policy
options for sustainable livelihoods Benis N. Egoh, Patrick J. O'Farrell,
Aymen Charef, Leigh Josephine Gurney, Thomas Koellner, Henry Nibam Abi, Mody
Egoh, Louise Willemen

Scientific work on ecosystem services has been growing globally as well as
in Africa. Human dependence on provisioning ecosystem services in particular
is mostly acknowledged in developing countries like those in Africa, where
many people are poor and reliant on natural resources. The reliance of
communities on natural resources in Africa varies from place to place as
aridity, vegetation and socio-economic conditions change. In the humid and
forested areas in the west and central parts of Africa, food and raw
materials coupled with agriculture are important ecosystem services while in
the dryer arid and semi-arid countries in southern and northern Africa,
tourism, water and grazing are priorities. Overexploitation of resources
coupled with large scale agriculture threatens both ecosystem services and
livelihoods. The need to safeguard ecosystem services is urgent.
There are some efforts to safeguard ecosystem services in Africa.
However, realizing benefits to livelihoods still faces serious challenges
due to climate change, recent land grabbing and urbanization. These
challenges are compounded by the land tenure situation in Africa. Whilst
policy goals have been established at both the international and national
levels the implementation of such policies and likelihood of them leading to
sustainable land management for delivery of ecosystem services remains a key
challenge.

=================
Bioplan is a list server run jointly by UNDP and UNEP. To join / leave
bioplan, email:  [email protected] with "subscribe" or "unsubscribe"
in the subject line. Please note:  If you wish to reply to the sender only
you must create a new message addressed only to that individual, or forward
the message to that individual.  Using the "reply" or "reply all" option
delivers your response to the entire network.


Reply via email to