Dear colleagues,

we cordially invite you to submit panels or papers for two sections organized 
by the environmental politics standing group of the European Consortium for 
Political Research (ECPR).
The sections will be part of the next ECPR General Conference in Glasgow, 3-6 
September 2014. The section themes are:
"Politics and Governance in the Anthropocene"
"Environmental Politics"

Please see below for submission instructions and for the section abstracts. For 
the 'anthropocene' section we also provide brief abstracts of five panels that 
address overarching research themes. But please feel free to submit additional 
panels also for that section, if you prefer.

We hope this will be of interest to many of you, since the framing of the two 
sections provides ample opportunities for submissions on a variety of 
environmental governance topics across sectors and scales.

All the best,
Brian Doherty, Philipp Pattberg, Hannes Stephan, and Fariborz Zelli

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Fariborz Zelli,
Assistant Professor

Department of Political Science / Statsvetenskapliga institutionen
Lund University / Lunds universitet
Box 52
SE-221 00 Lund
Sweden

tel :  + 46 46 222 47 64
fax : + 46 46 222 40 06
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Submission Instructions
If you like to submit a panel or paper, please note that you have to do so 
through the official ECPR website (not via e-mail to me): http://www.ecpr.eu/ . 
You also need to have (or create) a MyECPR account. After logging in, follow 
the links "events", "general conference" and then, under 'Glasgow 2014', 
"propose a panel" or "propose a paper". When filling in your abstracts and 
details, you can then choose one of our sections from the first drop down menu. 
The deadline for submissions is 15th February 2014.
For detailed submission guidelines see also 
http://ecpr.eu/Filestore/Files/Conferences/General/2014GlasgowGuidelinesAndDeadlines.pdf
SECTION No. S028 - ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS

Section Chairs:
Brian Doherty, University of Keele
Hannes Stephan, University of Stirling

This section is designed to gather a series of eight panels focusing on current 
issues in and approaches to environmental politics. Given the prominent 
position occupied by environmental thematics within public policy agendas, 
regulatory systems, social movement mobilisations, and systems of political 
competition, we expect to attract a diverse range of panels from scholars 
working throughout the academic community and across political science 
disciplines.

We will particularly encourage panels which develop a comparative analytical 
framework in their rationale, and expect proposals reflecting both the more 
conventional core interests in the study of environmental politics as well as 
more contemporary areas of academic enquiry. These are expected to include 
environmental science and public policy; Green political theory; Green parties; 
environmental issues within electoral systems; environmental mobilization, 
protest and civil society; environmental policy and regulation; policy learning 
and policy implementation across political systems; sustainable development; 
the environment within international institutions and governance regimes; and 
the construction of 'green' scientific and political discourses.

The overall aim of the section is for all panels to draw together conceptual 
expertise and rigorous empirical analysis in order to explore, challenge and 
re-configure theories surrounding environmental problems, both new and old. The 
ECPR Environmental Politics Standing Group has over 300 members at present and 
its sections have been vibrant and over-subscribed at all seven of the ECPR 
General conferences to date.


SECTION No. S049 - POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE IN THE ANTHROPOCENE

Section Chairs:
Philipp Pattberg, VU University Amsterdam
Fariborz Zelli, Lund University
Politics and Governance in the Anthropocene The term anthropocene denotes a new 
geological epoch in planetary history, one that is characterized by the 
unprecedented impact of human activities on the Earth's ecosystems. Scientists 
today see mounting evidence that the entire earth system now operates well 
outside safe boundaries. Human societies must therefore change course and steer 
away from critical tipping points that might lead to rapid and irreversible 
change, while ensuring sustainable livelihoods for all. But while the natural 
sciences have advanced their understanding of the drivers and processes of 
global change considerably over the last two decades, the social sciences lag 
behind in developing and implementing a coherent research paradigm to address 
this fundamental challenge of politics and governance in the anthropocene. The 
key question from a social science perspective is how to organize the 
co-evolution of societies and their surrounding environment, in other words, 
how to develop effective and equitable governance solutions for today's global 
transformations. This section invites panels to close this crucial research 
gap, in particular with regards to the following 5 overarching research themes: 
(i) the role and relevance of institutions, both formal and informal as well as 
international and transnational, for governing in the anthropocene; (ii) the 
question of agency and actorness in addressing planetary challenges; (iii) the 
relevance of normative concerns in governing in the anthropocene, including 
questions about fairness, equity, justice and allocation; (iv) the role and 
relevance of accountability and other democratic principles for governing in 
the anthropocene; (v) the challenge of adapting societies at different scales 
to global change.
Abstracts of Panels

Institutions for the Anthropocene
Panel Chair: Kacper Sulecki, Hertie School of Governance
The panel addresses the emergence, design and effectiveness of governance 
systems and their integration across scales levels. How does the increasing 
institutional fragmentation of environmental governance impact on effectiveness 
and legitimacy? Which discursive shifts and societal transformations are 
reflected in this institutional architecture? How do transnational and informal 
institutions contribute to governing the anthropocene?
Agency in the Anthropocene
Panel Chair: Agni Kalfagianni, Institute for Environmental Studies, VU 
University Amsterdam
Submissions to this panel scrutinize the influence, roles and responsibilities 
of non-state actors, such as business and non-profit organizations. This 
includes the ways in which authority is granted to these agents, and how it is 
exercised. And also: how can we evaluate the relevance of these agents in 
governing the anthropocene?
Allocation and Access in the Anthropocene Panel
Panel Chair: Karin Bäckstrand, Lund University
The novel character of earth system transformation puts questions of justice, 
fairness, and equity in a new light. How can we reach interdisciplinary 
conceptualizations and definitions of access to goods and their allocation? 
What (overarching) principles underlie allocation and access? Which role do or 
should inter-spatial and inter-generational concepts of agency play here?
Accountability in the Anthropocene
Panel Chair: Aarti Gupta, Wageningen University
We need to understand the democratic quality of governing the anthropocene. 
What are the sources of accountability and legitimacy in a changing governance 
architecture? What are the effects of different forms and degrees of 
accountability and legitimacy for the performance of governance systems? How 
can mechanisms of transparency ensure accountable and legitimate environmental 
governance?
Adapting to the Anthropocene
Panel Chair:  Dave Huitema, Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University 
Amsterdam
Earth system governance must respond to the inherent uncertainties in human and 
natural systems. It must combine stability to ensure long-term governance 
solutions with flexibility to react quickly to new findings and developments. 
But what are the politics of adaptiveness? Which attributes of governance 
systems enhance capacities to adapt?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"gep-ed" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to