As a class assignment, I am having students explain why states are (going to) take the positions they are taking at the Paris climate talks. I would appreciate two types of suggested articles:
a) Theoretical pieces, a la Sprinz and Vaahtoranta's IO piece in 1994, that provide a general framework for why states take the positions they do. b) More "climate-related" pieces that (allege to) EXPLAIN the positions of different groups (AOSIS, Group of 77, Umbrella Group, etc.) but do so with some degree of theoretical sophistication. Thanks (and I promise to report back - I still need to do that on a previous request). Ron Ronald Mitchell, Professor Department of Political Science and Program in Environmental Studies University of Oregon, Eugene OR 97403-1284 [email protected] http://rmitchel.uoregon.edu/ IEA Database Director: http://iea.uoregon.edu/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "gep-ed" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
