*Call for Abstracts – ISA 2020*


Dear GEPers,



We are looking to put together a panel that examines the role of trust in
global environmental governance. Trust is an essential characteristic of
relationships which facilitates repeated and cooperative interactions
between individuals, communities, and organizations, but its dynamics are
not fully understood, particularly in global governance. To understand
better the role that trust may play in shaping global environmental
governance, we are looking to curate a set of papers that consider how
different forms and concepts shape the practices and processes of global
environmental governance. Potential areas of interest include: Trust and
Information/Translational Trust (trust in knowledge processes); trust and
institutions; trust and justice; and trust and negotiations. We are
interested in all topics in global environmental governance. We have pasted
a brief abstract for the proposed panel below.



If you are interested in participating in this panel, please submit an
abstract to [email protected] and [email protected] by *May
15* so that we have time to assemble the panel and submit it to ISA by the
June deadline.



Please let us know if you have any questions!



Best,



Kim Marion Suiseeya and Chris Paul



*Proposed Panel Title:* Trust and Global Environmental Governance



*Panel Organizers:* Kimberly R. Marion Suiseeya (Northwestern University)
and Christopher J. Paul (North Carolina Central University)



*Abstract:*



What role does trust play in global environmental governance? Trust is an
essential characteristic of relationships which facilitates repeated and
cooperative interactions between individuals, communities, and
organizations. Trust is also a multifaceted phenomenon, and set within a
variety of pre-conditions and power dynamics that are not fully understood,
particularly in global governance. Indeed, claims of mistrust and distrust,
rather than trust, have dominated international environmental policy
arenas, especially around climate change, for decades. Three key debates
have been characterized by a lack of trust: the science of climate change,
the distribution of rights and responsibilities among global actors
(including Nation-states, corporations, Indigenous Peoples, etc.), and the
community-level dynamics of environmental change. Although not always
identified in research, these trust dynamics likely shape the production of
global environmental governance. For example, climate scepticism has led to
significant concentration of efforts on determining the causes of climate
change, rather than cultivating solutions. Concerns over equity and
fairness in emissions reductions policies have delayed urgent climate
action. Communities vulnerable to the impacts of climate change are
hesitant to endorse emissions reductions programs like REDD+ and are
doubtful of the provision of local benefit. This panel addresses the role
of trust in global environmental governance to explain and identify how
trust flows and interacts along multiple dimensions with other key concepts
in global governance, such as legitimacy, authority, and credibility.
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Kimberly R. Marion Suiseeya
Assistant Professor
Department of Political Science
Northwestern University
https://sites.northwestern.edu/suiseeya/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"gep-ed" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to