On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 09:01 +0100, Stefan Petersen wrote:
> Dan McMahill wrote:
> > Julian wrote:
> >> Most of the bug fixes were all edge cases, so the user would probably 
> >> never notice.  However there was a biggy...segfault when clicking 
> >> "modify layer orientation" with no open layer.
> >> I would vote for 1) release 2.4 since it's easier, and 2) push to get 
> >> 2.4 into Lucid by calling it a bug fix (which it is).  If they complain 
> >> about that one patch for the aperture report, we can send them a diff to 
> >> remove that change for their package.  It's probably about 10 lines of 
> >> code really.
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > done.  Still uploading the windows installer but the source release and 
> > release notes are there.
> 
> Good work everybody! If any one has a fast lane to Ubuntu upgrade it
> would be great to pull out that card from the sleeve. It took couple of
> months until the 2.3 went in.

As a start, I've poked the Debian pkg-electronics team to request they
package 2.4.0 (although I should really just have filed a bug).

I've also asked that they try to keep the packaging churn down - as
we're now in Feature Freeze for Ubuntu Lucid, I'll have to follow the
Feature Freeze exception process to try and get a sync of 1.4.0 approved
(once Debian package it).

This involves showing diffs between the versions (e.g. all code
changes), and justifying why the risk / reward of introducing the new
package is beneficial to the distro. The fact there are very few
non-bugfix changes is good.

gerbv has no open bugs in Ubuntu..
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gerbv

If some users had filed bugs which are now fixed in the 2.4.0, that
would look better for the FFE process I think. I can't very well go
filing them myself though.. as that might seem a little underhanded.

If there is anyone on this list who uses Ubuntu (or has a Launchpad
account), and has been affected by any bugs fixed in 2.4.0, please go
ahead and file them on Launchpad!


Best wishes,

-- 
Peter Clifton

Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA

Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Gerbv-devel mailing list
Gerbv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gerbv-devel

Reply via email to