As Miklos Marton wrote: > > As it's wishtime :), being able to bundle entire archives would > > certainly make sense, as*Gerbv now already can panelize*, so that > > would be the final step for a production-ready archive file.
> What do you exactly mean panelize in the gerbv case? A couple of years ago, I created this panel: http://uriah.heep.sax.de/outgoing/panel.png Based on the size of the scrollbar, you could guess how many (sub-)layers were involved. ;-) Input came from three or four different users using different EDA software, I prepared it for production. > I could be used to mousebite together designs like this: > > https://cdn.hackaday.io/images/8178811494287647595.PNG Well, I rather left the milling spacers between the subpanels to the manufacturer: they can handle that much more efficiently, they have a standard pattern for these spacers and they know well how many of them are needed. But otherwise: yes, exactly that. -- cheers, Joerg .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Gerbv-devel mailing list Gerbv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gerbv-devel
