all the three implementations can be accepted, maybe more, but the interface is unique, as a j2ee container, is it right? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Cabrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Christian Trutz'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 8:24 PM Subject: RE: how about maven?
> > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Christian Trutz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > 1. Managing the EJB's using reflection > > > 2. Managing the EJB's through dynamic proxies > > > 3. Managing the EJB's using JMX > > > > > > > i think it should be possible to have many different > > implementations of the EJB container and the user(admin) > > should then decide whichone he is using ... > > OpenEJB uses this idea. > > > Regards, > Alan >
