> But wouldn't it be better to use code refactored from JAMES? Well yeah. except that James doesn't have an implementation of javaMail :-)
We only use outgoing Smtp and that from the RI (though we keep discussing implementing it ourselves), and the message classes are part of the API, that is to say they're real functioning classes not interfaces. If you've written an alternative to MimeMessage et-al you'd be very welcome to discuss it over at James though where Mime parsing performance is always a hotly debated topic.. d.
