On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 12:23:15 -0400 (EDT) Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Kington, Max wrote:This could be a function of the security provilages, in terms of visibility.
E.g. with a particular group of user logins to the directory, they are
associated
with a different underlying directory stores.
True, but it also impinges on configuration and deployment. Several servers assume that resources such as JDBC/JMS/JavaMail are
"server" resources not "application" resources. In other words, if 5 apps
need 8 DB pools, then all 8 pools are visible to all 5 apps. We would
need to agree in principle to at least allow, if not require, resources to
be associated with specific applications.
Aaron
Would a server configuration similar to Tomcats common, shared, and apps be benificial to allow for maximum flexablity for configuring Geronimo, and the apps deployed to it?
Sean
<TEXTAREA NAME="Signature" ROWS="4" COLS="60">
