AFAIK OpenJms is the most suitable JMS implementation today which has a
suitable licence for Geronimo. If another JMS implementation were to
come along, or folks fancied hacking another one together cool - but
until then I don't see another option for the foreseeable future.
On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 03:42 pm, N. Alex Rupp wrote:
I believe David Jencks and Hiram Chirino would have more to say about
this.
Hiram's a bit preoccupied this week (moving).
James, what do you know about the JMS plans?
: )
--
N. Alex Rupp ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 8:27 AM
Subject: Re: OpenJMS and EJB MDBs
Is OpenJMS primary JMS implementation for Geronimo?
Presuming this decision has not already been made, what are the
options
for JMS in Geronimo ?
A) Use/Fork OpenJMS ?
B) Implement a new stand-alone JMS provider ?
C) Implement a new JMS provider using services from Geronimo
(persistence, trans, etc) ?
IMHO Options A and C seems like the best ones!
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
