Quotes inline. Denes
Citando Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Denes wrote: > > I think that this can be solved or by assuming that this is an > > administration issue or by creating some kind of proxy that will listen > > in the default port and redirect the request to the proper service > > implementation (can't tell if this can be done for all J2EE stack > > components). > > Which reminds me, does anyone have any thoughts on the possibility > and/or wisdom of multiplexing all network communication over a single > port? You know, HTTP, RMI, JNDI, IIOP, etc. all on the same port (sure, I > have 7001 in mind)? It makes it darn easy to configure, firewall, tunnel, > etc. at the cost of (I assume) quite a bit of complexity in terms of > initially accepting the connection, figuring out the protocol, and sending > it to the proper handler. > > > AFAIK this can be done by the classloader hierarchy (as in Tomcat). So, > > one could install the various J2EE components in a common place and > > configure each server to use the implementation that it wants to. > > Yes. > > > Don't agree with the idea of installing the product twice because of the > > common services configuration described above, and because this would be > > a really ugly solution :), but I think that the two approaches can live > > together with no problems. > > > > Besides, I�m not arguing to separate the servers by separating the VMs > > of each server, although this sound like a good solution to me, if the > > VM's footprint don't become a issue to worry about. I'm just saying that > > creating several server directories is better than assuming a > > each-ear-is-a-separate-application policy or creating a config file to > > say how the ears are grouped. > > Do you mean, for example, one VM, but 3 deploy dirs, and > everything in a deploy dir is grouped together but separated from the rest > of the "deployments", and all the deploy dirs are started when the server > is started? Then you can put one ear per deploy dir, or 10 EARs per > deploy dir, and it will just load things together which are located > together? That makes sense to me. > > Aaron > Yes. This is exactly what I had in mind. Can't tell if it's the better approach, but can be done. Cheers, Denes ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
