On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Danny Angus wrote:
> Alex, > > > required that an implementation re-create them. In fact the original reason > mooted for doing so was simply to make them available under the ASFL. This > is perhaps a worthwhile sentiment as far as the j2ee API's which are mainly > interfaces are concerned, but javax.mail is mainly implementation, and > implementation of a lot of unattractive RFC conformance to boot. With this education having occurred, my sentiment would be for a asfj2ee-javamail-api.jar existing which contains the api and not the implementation made available. Sentiment could be utterly wrong though if it's not possible. Hen
