I would like to start implementing the DDBeans from JSR-88. I will start a new thread for JSR-88.
--- Srihari S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > cool...so what are we waiting for!!!! > lets get started with the requirements/design of the > verifier.. > any ideas on the way of working for these phases.. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan Duty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 8:14 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: J2EE DeploymentManager ( was J2EE > deployment verifier) > > > I agree. The verification engine really doesn't > need to implement the > deployment specs. Later when we implement the > DeploymentManager in > front of it that's when we will have to worry about > implementing the > exact interfaces. > > ~Jonathan > > > Jonathan Duty > Software Developer - eWashtenaw > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Weston M. Price [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 5:48 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: J2EE DeploymentManager ( was J2EE > deployment verifier) > > I agree with Srihari in that the Verification > manager does not have to > implement the spec interfaces, however, the > DeploymentManager does, this > > would be where we would implment DDRoot, DDConfig > etc.....in some ways > the > DeploymentManager would just use the services of the > VerificatinoEngine > as > one step in the process of actual deployment. > > Is this in line with what you guys were thinking? > > > On Wednesday 13 August 2003 01:52 pm, Jonathan Duty > wrote: > > When we implement this module, we could actually > implement it to > exactly > > follow the API specs (JSR 88). That means > implementing the > > DeploymentManager interface on top of it and such. > That way any > > application (ant, Eclipse, etc) that is equipped > to deploy packages > > could interface with it. It would just fall short > of actually > > communicating with MBeans and deploying the > package. > > > > When this module is used internally (within the > REAL deployment > manager) > > it could just bypass or override the > Verification's Deployment > manager. > > > > ~Jonathan > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Srihari S > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 9:43 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: J2EE DeploymentManager ( was J2EE > deployment verifier) > > > > Hi All > > When I was going thru the deployment api spec I > thought it would be > > good > > to bring up some points: > > > > From a preliminary reading of the spec i saw there > are no apis > > explicitly > > designed to do the verification > > of a deployable unit. From this I infer that the > verifier can be an > > internal > > module which could be used > > by the deploy tool. So we could go full steam on > its design and > > implementation. In this regard I am trying to > > jot the list of checks that our verifier will have > to do (This is > > mentioned > > in the j2ee specs). > > So in a way it will be equivalent to arriving at > requirement specs for > > the > > verifier. > > With the list of dos and donts that a verifier has > to achieve we could > > go > > abt with design.Also the design of > > ant hooks can be taken care.Can we?? > > > > Next is something abt the big picture. Certainly > the verifer is a > small > > part > > of the deployment process. > > But to achieve compliance we will have to > implement the deployment > spec > > as a > > whole. Has anyone given > > thought to this issue? > > > > regards > > Hari > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Weston M. Price [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 1:33 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: J2EE DeploymentManager ( was J2EE > deployment verifier) > > > > > > No, I think splitting them up would be good.... > > > > Weston > > > > On Tuesday 12 August 2003 11:41 pm, Jonathan Duty > wrote: > > > I'm creating a maven module to add to the cvs > project. > > > Do we want to plan on the DeploymentManager, > VerificationEngine, and > > > DeploymentEngine being in one module? > > > > > > What do you all think? > > > > > > ~Jonathan > > > > > > Weston M. Price wrote: > > > >Just thought I should start a new thread.... > > > > > > > >My KMail was getting dominated! > > > > > > > >Weston > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
