> > Would it be better to set it to false so we deal with these from the > > outset? > > Not IMHO. Unless you fancy debugging class loader issues in maven / > junit / ant / jaxp which has nothing whatsoever to do with Geronimo. > Note we're talking about class loader issues of actually running the > Ant JUnit tasks inside Maven here - not Geronimo based class loading > problems. > > After suffering various class loader issues in the past (especially > about using XML inside a JUnit test case) I always set this flag to > true. Though be my guest if you wanna turn it off - just be warned & > get ready to flip it back on later. >
It a compromise to run one junit task in a separate VM so there is one fork not a bizillion? This would isolate us from maven/ant issues leaving us with just junit/geronimo ones (which we ought to fix if this thing is going to be embeddable). -- Jeremy
