+1 on this. What would be nice to see are interfaces that are, in their own right, separately deployable. For those who do not want to run a web service, a thicker UI could be used - while the remaining populus can use the thin UI. For immediate development I'd much prefer seeing a web admin. Leave the thicker UI's (and even different flavors of web UI's) on a "we don't have this yet - but we ack the usefulness" list for now.
My 1 cent. Brian On 14 Aug 2003 at 9:16, Rahul wrote: > I think we can concentrate on getting started with a Web Admin UI first and > then get on to standalone one .. > :) > rahul > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gary Yang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 9:08 AM > Subject: Re: WebServices & UI team > > > > My suggestion is, the server can have a webservice interface over JMX. The > > frontend can be thin or thick UI (web or Swing/SWT). > > > > Gary > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Tim Urberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 5:01 PM > > Subject: Re: WebServices & UI team > > > > > > > I think we should use a web interface rather than Swing or SWT for the > UI, > > what > > > does everyone else think? > > > > > > Tim > > > > > > --- Gary Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Swing or SWT? > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: Felipe Oliveira > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 4:32 PM > > > > Subject: Re: WebServices & UI team > > > > > > > > > > > > i would definetely be interested in the UI...let me know how it > > involves. > > > > > > > > Rahul wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Guys, > > > > > > > > I'd like to contribute for Web Services and UI (admin console) but > > > > haven't come across any threads discussing same. > > > > Any clues if there's been anything already initiated on same ? > > > > > > > > cheers, > > > > > > > > Rahul > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
