I agree too, it would be a good idea to have a jsp/servlet web interface over the jmx core for administration purposes and a wsdl definition on top of jmx for administering the MBeans wich is the kind of administration you would want in a JMX environment.
greets ----- Original Message ----- From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 7:27 AM Subject: RE: WebServices & UI team > Gary, > > > >I think that putting SOAP under JMX is questionable, but I'm curious to > hear > > > you elaborate if you care to do so. > > > Well, with WebService (not only SOAP) interface, we can have a choice to > > build or integrate the management functions to a non-Java envrionment, > > for example, an enterprise wide management console, or an enterprise > > level web management application. > > I agree with you. Perhaps you missed a bit of context. I agree with a WSDL > interface. My comment was that the WSDL interface should be implemented on > top of JMX, rather than try to stick WSDL under JMX (which my reading of the > JSR 160 and understanding of WSDL suggests would not be a good fit). > > --- Noel >
