+1 @version $Revision$ $Date$
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Dillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:38 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Standard @version tags > > > Can we make a decision on this? > > Either: > > @version $Revision$ $Date$ > > or: > > @version $Revision$ > > Personally I like to see how old the file is from the JavaDocs, but > really I care more about what the final decision is, I will go either > way. > > --jason > > PS. Once we decide I will clean up my sources ;-) > > > On Thursday, August 14, 2003, at 01:59 AM, Bruce Snyder wrote: > > > This one time, at band camp, Jeremy Boynes said: > > > > JB>> I actually prefer the following because it cantains all I need: > > JB>> > > JB>> @version $Id$ > > JB> > > JB>We opted against $Id$ during the import to avoid having the > > username in > > JB>there (the @author thing). > > > > I should have made a note about that because as I sent the > message I > > realized that for that reason alone I can understand why we > didn't use > > $Id$. > > > > +1 for @version $Revision$ $Date$ > > > > Bruce > > -- > > perl -e 'print > > unpack("u30","<0G)[EMAIL PROTECTED]&5R\"F9E<G)E=\$\!F<FEI+F-O;0\`\`");' > > > > The Castor Project > > http://www.castor.org/ > > > > Apache Geronimo http://incubator.apache.org/projects/geronimo.html > > >
