But I think we should aim to duplicate the behavior defined by the spec, not the idiosyncracies present in the RI. The doc doesn't say anywhere that you should be able to register a null factory, and again, why iterate through a list full of nulls and duplicate entries?
Aaron On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Personaly I agree completely, but I discovered this behaviour while > writing the unittest against SUNs reference implementation. > I had to remove the null check from my original code to make the test > failures go away. :)
