On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, James Strachan wrote:
> On Thursday, August 14, 2003, at 04:55 am, Aaron Mulder wrote:
> > .enterprise.deploy.provider // the JSR-88 provider code
> > .enterprise.deploy.tool // the JSR-88 tool code
> > .enterprise.deploy.server // the back-end Geronimo logic that
> > // is not specific to JSR-88
>
> How about the above but without the .enterprise? Geronimo is an
> enterprise server so I guess thats not required.
Then we would have geronimo.deployment and geronimo.deploy which
do very different things... We could go with "appdeploy" or something;
I'm just having trouble coming up with anything that's better than
enterprise.deploy but doesn't clash with "deployment". Perhaps the
content currently in "deployment" could be moved to a subpackage, and then
everything could go in subpackages of "deployment"?
Aaron
