Can you change a couple of things here please. These should be interface definitions rather than concrete classes - there could be a variety of classes implementing them.
Secondly, there should not need to be any references to javax.management in them - the intention is that this model can be used by non-Java clients and so all the attributes should be simple types; for example, the spec defines the OBJECT_NAME type to be a string. If you can fix these issues, I'll commit them. Thanks Jeremy > -----Original Message----- > From: gianny DAMOUR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 7:07 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PATCH] JSR77 - 4 managed objects > > > Hi, > > > The following patch implements - partially - the following model > components > of JSR77: > > - J2EEManagedObject; > - J2EEDomain; > - J2EEServer; and > - JVM > > Two conveniance classes, namely J2EEModelElement and J2EEModelVisitor are > defined to traverse the JSR77 model (Visitor pattern). > J2EEModelVisitorTest > is a unit test of the traversal mechanism. > > These components are defined in the package > org.apache.geronimo.management.j2ee as suggested. > > It is definitively a small patch (4 components) compared to the number of > components defined by JSR77 (32). However, it should be great to > add it to > CVS in order to keep others aware of the progress. > > Moreover, it should be great to create a new sub-project for JSR77, e.g. > management, to keep the core sub-project browsable. > > Cheers, > Gianny > > _________________________________________________________________ > The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail >
