Just for the sake of completeness (possibly javadoc/IDEdoc integration?)...
Don't care enough to pick a fight though :) It's up to u. Maas On Sat, 2003-08-16 at 16:10, Jason Dillon wrote: > I do not see the point of this patch, as all it does is change the > argument names, which are not part of the signature. > > --jason > > > On Saturday, August 16, 2003, at 07:30 PM, Maas van den Berg wrote: > > > > > <jta-signatures-fix.patch> >
