On Sat, 2003-08-16 at 17:48, Jeremy Boynes wrote: > The TCK is the final arbiter of the spec. > > In this case, there is an ambiguity in the spec - the RI does one thing > which we think is weird. Provided what we implement conforms to the spec and > passes the TCK then we do not need to duplicate the behaviour of the RI. Agreed. Just meant to say, it doesn't hurt to mimic until we have a TCK.
> Now all we need is a TCK :-) Bring it on! Maas
