On Friday, Aug 29, 2003, at 12:59 Europe/London, Daniel S. Haischt wrote:

Alex Blewitt wrote:

[...]

You also have to consider the case when a clustered system is in operation. Then, they are likely to need to share data that is installed, and a sensible back-end may need to synchronize such writes across a number of nodes/clusters.
I agree for a single-server environment, having an in-memory cache will be the fastest, but having a switchable JNDI server will allow both :-)

is there already someone working on a clustering solution?

sometimes i am wondering whether we are aiming to provide a all-in-one
wonder. wouldn't it be possible to start with a more simple in-memory
solution and switch to a more complex solution while Geronimo emerges?

Geronimo is currently a single-node system. It would obviously be desirable to support clustering at a later stage.


However, thinking about the aspects involved in clustering now, it allows us to make better abstractions which will allow us to migrate to a clustered solution easier in the future.

Alex.



Reply via email to