Jason Dillon wrote:
Also, why name some XML files as .conf files? Can't they be named .xml
to easily identify them as XML files? May be like {some-name}-conf.xml?
Or put all configuration files under a conf directory with XML
extension?
Why does it matter? There are XML Schema files which have an .xsd
extension. They are xml files, but I would not suggest using .xml over
.xsd.
One semi-common convention is to name them .xconf to identify them as XML
Configuration files. Also there is .xlog (XML Log configuration file).
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin
