I would wait for Dain's feedback before redesigning this. -- Jeremy
> -----Original Message----- > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Wilkins > Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2003 9:25 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: gianny DAMOUR > Subject: Re: [jsr77][core] Components & Containers. > > > > Greg Wilkins wrote: > > ... > > But, hopefully most of it can be solved with some renaming > and/or > a minor restructure. > ... > > Actually reading Giany's issues (14 & 73), I think we need a > bit more of a rename/restructure. > > It does appear that our current AbstractComponent and > AbstractContainer really should be ManagedObjects and it is > simple to make them implement the ManagedObject interface. > > Also instead of renaming them to StateManageableComponent & > StateManageableContainer (as per my previous email) I think > it makes more sense to rename them to ManagedComponent and > ManagedContainer > > However, they should probably extend AbstractManagedObject - > which currently duplicates much of the content of > AbstractStateManageable. Thus I think > AbstractStateManageable should be moved to kernel and used as > the base for AbstracteManagedObject. > > Thus we would end up with the following hierarchy: > > kernel: > > <<StateManageable>> > ^ > | > > AbstractStateManageable > ^ > | > > AbstractManagedObject > ^ > core: | > <<Component>> <--- AbstractComponent <--- > ManagedComponent > ^ ^ ^ > | | | > <<Container>> <--- AbstractContainer -----o > ManagedContainer > ^ / > \ / > ---------------------------------- > > > > > > >
