Re: XML POJO Update (XMLBeans)

[Andy Barnett]

According to Commerce One, one of the benefits of XGen is that you ~cannot~ configure the binding process. They argue that since there is only one non-configurable way for XGen to generate Java from XML, you can better guarantee what comes out of the binding process. I don't know how valid that argument is, but that's the gist of it that I got from their propaganda.

~Andy

On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 14:31, Bruce Snyder wrote:

This one time, at band camp, Andy Barnett said:

AB>There's even a comparison already done for you among XGen, Castor, Sun's
AB>JAXB RI, and Breeze:
AB>http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/2003/09/03/binding.html

I spoke to Arnaud Blandin (committer for Castor XML (because I only
work on Castor JDO)) about this review, and he said that the reason the
reviewer states that Castor XML doesn't support feature X is because
she did not configure Castor XML at all.

Bruce