IIRC, core JMX (JSR-3) suffers from the same issue as JavaMail in that the specification includes a lot of concrete implementation. There was a discussion on the MX4J list about trying to separate it out and produce an interface version there but it was considered unfeasable. Geronimo is using MX4J for its JMX implementation.
I don't know if that is also true for JSR-160 but we are currently getting that from MX4J as well. -- Jeremy > -----Original Message----- > From: Ralph Apel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 11:10 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [specs] J2EE specs for certification > > > Do we need specs-modules for all of them? > > Do we need specs/jmx (for JSR-3 and JSR-160) ? > > > > On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 17:10, Bruce Snyder wrote: > > There is a list of J2EE specs on the Wiki: > > > > http://wiki.codehaus.org/geronimo/J2EESpecs > > > > but they seem to be incomplete. Can someone comment on > this? Is this > > list incomplete? I'm trying to use this as a list of work and the > > current status on each one. > > > > Bruce > > -- > > perl -e 'print > unpack("u30","<0G)[EMAIL PROTECTED]&5R\"F9E<G)E=\$\!F<FEI+F-O;0\`\`");' > > > > The Castor Project > > http://www.castor.org/ > > > > Apache Geronimo > > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/geronimo.html > > > > >
