> > I really like your reasoning below. Some Jboss guys have posted on > > http://www.theserverside.com/home/thread.jsp?thread_id=22337.
> And by my score, the community is turning this into a farce -- this > seems to be backfiring for [JBoss] Well, having two exhibits out of three turn out to be (apparently) derived ASF code which somehow lost its ASF license and got put under the LGPL has to be a bit embarrassing if true. ref: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/jboss/jboss-common/src/main/org/jboss/ logging/XLevel.java http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-log4j/examples/customLevel/XLevel. java > still - lets get a response together. Maybe simply inviting the > discussion here would help. Inviting JBoss to submit any substantive claims that they may have directly to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that they can be addressed seems a reasonable step. --- Noel
