Attention is currently required from: fixeria, pespin.
laforge has posted comments on this change. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/27356 )

Change subject: bitvec2freq_list(): fix handling of E-GSM ARFCNs
......................................................................


Patch Set 1: Code-Review-1

(3 comments)

Patchset:

PS1:
this is the kind of issue where a clear-cut unit test showing the bug should be 
introduced first, and then the bug should be fixed in a follow-up commit, 
demonstrating that the unit test now passes.

I don't see immediately how his commit fixes anything - all it does is to 
return error values to the caller and log something, but it's not immediately 
obvious how an alternative encoding is chosen.


File src/osmo-bsc/system_information.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/27356/comment/14e3e6ae_1cdc5154
PS1, Line 508:  && bts->c0->arfcn >= 1 && bts->c0->arfcn <= 124)
             :          pgsm = true;
isn't this the true bug? PGSM is primary GSM, and not E-GSM 900.  So the pgsm 
flag should never be set in a situation where E-GSM channels are used.  Maybe 
we should not just check for c0->arfcn but iterate over all channels and set 
pgsm only true if all of them are within the P-GSM range?


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/27356/comment/a9653cb1_024d2227
PS1, Line 522:                          /
how are we attempting to use a different format here? we return an error.



--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/27356
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I17739e6845cd84e2a81bc406dd532541f7c52cb6
Gerrit-Change-Number: 27356
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: fixeria <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2022 09:13:12 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment

Reply via email to