Attention is currently required from: laforge, pespin.
fixeria has posted comments on this change. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/28086 )

Change subject: measurement: fix matching of SUB frames by TDMA FN
......................................................................


Patch Set 1:

(3 comments)

File src/common/measurement.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/28086/comment/96cb455c_8d48a5cc
PS1, Line 23:   /* TCH/H(0): 0, 2, 4, 6, 52, 54, 56, 58 */
> Maybe use ";" to separate between the 2 blocks, it's easier to understand: […]
In this comment it's just a set of FNs copied from 3GPP TS 45.008 as-is. Blocks 
with the respective FNs they consist of are listed below this comment. I don't 
think a semicolon makes sense here.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/28086/comment/fd642245_a8d7b4af
PS1, Line 26:   /* TCH/H(1): 14, 16, 18, 20, 66, 68, 70, 72 */
> same
Same here, blocks are listed below. This is one-to-one copy from 3GPP TS 45.008.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/28086/comment/ac4879d4_c7c4c3ec
PS1, Line 65:                    * There is only one *complete* block in this 
subset starting at FN=52.
> So you first say there's a complete block starting at FN=52, but in next line 
> you say the one starti […]
The first FN of incomplete block {52, 53, 54, 55} is actually several FNs 
earlier, because on TCH/F every block is interleaved over 8 consecutive bursts. 
But in DTXu mode, the MS does not transmit the first 4 bursts - that's why I am 
not listing them in square brackets. Maybe saying {... 52, 53, 54, 55} and {56, 
57, 58, 59 ...} would make it cleaner?



--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/28086
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I8cc3a755a8ad4dc564439aab2298c1e97ac0592d
Gerrit-Change-Number: 28086
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: fixeria <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 13:26:08 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment

Reply via email to