Attention is currently required from: iedemam, neels, pespin, fixeria, dexter.
laforge has posted comments on this change. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/28276 )

Change subject: Expand VTY option which controls use of TCH for signalling
......................................................................


Patch Set 4:

(2 comments)

File include/osmocom/bsc/bts.h:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/28276/comment/9dd0757c_0859f3fe
PS4, Line 524: chan_alloc_allow_tch_for_signalling
cosmetic: I'd rename it to "tch_for_signalling_policy" or something like that 
which makes it more clear that it's no longer some boolean value.  Changing 
from bool to an enum but keeping the name identical might also hide bugs, as 
existing code using "if (chan_alloc_allow_tch_for_signalling)" will still 
compile but probably no longer do what we expect it to do.


File src/osmo-bsc/bts_vty.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/28276/comment/a036c560_c466fe52
PS4, Line 568: DEFUN_ATTR
it might be nice to add a backwards-compatibility alias for the (0|1) so old 
config files still parse.



--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/28276
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I4459941ddad4e4a3bec8409b180d9a23a735e640
Gerrit-Change-Number: 28276
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: iedemam <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: dexter <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <[email protected]>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: iedemam <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: neels <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: dexter <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 19:20:34 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment

Reply via email to