pespin has uploaded this change for review. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/29917 )


Change subject: tbf_fsm: Identify several events as Dl-TBF only
......................................................................

tbf_fsm: Identify several events as Dl-TBF only

This will help in the future when splitting tbf_fsm into different FSMs
for UL-TBF and DL-TBF, since only some of the events and staes are
shared.
That means we can keep a single state and event enum, but the FSMs can
be implemented separately in different files, easing a lot extending and
understanding the logic.

Change-Id: Id97f0d532d2d7ab2791a35c1f836d7c8da050124
---
M src/tbf_fsm.c
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)



  git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/osmo-pcu refs/changes/17/29917/1

diff --git a/src/tbf_fsm.c b/src/tbf_fsm.c
index f019214..9118fd7 100644
--- a/src/tbf_fsm.c
+++ b/src/tbf_fsm.c
@@ -202,6 +202,7 @@

        switch (event) {
        case TBF_EV_DL_ACKNACK_MISS:
+               OSMO_ASSERT(tbf_direction(ctx->tbf) == GPRS_RLCMAC_DL_TBF);
                /* DL TBF: we missed a DL ACK/NACK. If we started assignment
                 * over CCCH and never received any DL ACK/NACK yet, it means we
                 * don't even know if the MS successfuly received the Imm Ass on
@@ -223,6 +224,7 @@
                tbf_fsm_state_chg(fi, TBF_ST_FINISHED);
                break;
        case TBF_EV_FINAL_ACK_RECVD:
+               OSMO_ASSERT(tbf_direction(ctx->tbf) == GPRS_RLCMAC_DL_TBF);
                /* We received Final Ack (DL ACK/NACK) from MS. move to
                   WAIT_RELEASE, we wait there for release or re-use the TBF in
                   case we receive more DL data to tx */
@@ -249,8 +251,10 @@

        switch (event) {
        case TBF_EV_DL_ACKNACK_MISS:
+               OSMO_ASSERT(tbf_direction(ctx->tbf) == GPRS_RLCMAC_DL_TBF);
                break;
        case TBF_EV_FINAL_ACK_RECVD:
+               OSMO_ASSERT(tbf_direction(ctx->tbf) == GPRS_RLCMAC_DL_TBF);
                /* We received Final Ack (DL ACK/NACK) from MS. move to
                   WAIT_RELEASE, we wait there for release or re-use the TBF in
                   case we receive more DL data to tx */
@@ -314,6 +318,7 @@
        struct tbf_fsm_ctx *ctx = (struct tbf_fsm_ctx *)fi->priv;
        switch (event) {
        case TBF_EV_FINAL_ACK_RECVD:
+               OSMO_ASSERT(tbf_direction(ctx->tbf) == GPRS_RLCMAC_DL_TBF);
                /* ignore, duplicate ACK, we already know about since we are in 
WAIT_RELEASE */
                break;
        case TBF_EV_MAX_N3101:
@@ -351,8 +356,10 @@

 static void st_releasing(struct osmo_fsm_inst *fi, uint32_t event, void *data)
 {
+       struct tbf_fsm_ctx *ctx = (struct tbf_fsm_ctx *)fi->priv;
        switch (event) {
        case TBF_EV_DL_ACKNACK_MISS:
+               OSMO_ASSERT(tbf_direction(ctx->tbf) == GPRS_RLCMAC_DL_TBF);
                /* Ignore, we don't care about missed DL ACK/NACK poll timeouts
                 * anymore, we are already releasing the TBF */
                break;

--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/29917
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Id97f0d532d2d7ab2791a35c1f836d7c8da050124
Gerrit-Change-Number: 29917
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-MessageType: newchange

Reply via email to