Attention is currently required from: pespin.
fixeria has posted comments on this change. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/30266 )

Change subject: paging: Store list of gsm_paging_request in bsc_subscr
......................................................................


Patch Set 3: Code-Review+1

(3 comments)

File include/osmocom/bsc/bsc_subscriber.h:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/30266/comment/3175c358_9ed2c424
PS2, Line 57: gsm_paging_request
> In general yes, but for this one I preferred keeping it here with the subset 
> of functions specifical […]
Fine with me.


File src/osmo-bsc/bsc_subscriber.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/30266/comment/a88f956c_7ac7ba04
PS3, Line 270: it could be freed during put():
> I don't see the point in doing that here, that adds extra get/put which also 
> triggers allocations, l […]
I just took a look at the implementation of _osmo_use_count_get_put(), and... 
you're right. The refcounting API involves quite a lot of operations, so it's 
better be avoided here then.


File src/osmo-bsc/paging.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/30266/comment/b9b4c65a_735ee29f
PS3, Line 533: it could be freed during put():
> Same here, doing get(__func__) .. put(__func__) would be cleaner.
Cleaner, but worse in terms of performance (unfortunately) :/



--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/30266
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I831d0fe01d7812c34500362b90f47cd65645b666
Gerrit-Change-Number: 30266
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 19:01:19 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <[email protected]>
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <[email protected]>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment

Reply via email to