Review at https://gerrit.osmocom.org/5137
measurment.c: Introduce INFO category for DMEAS logging
There's no point in either having full verbosity in DEBUG level
and not logging any measurement related information in INFO. Let's
at least print the results at the end of each measurement period in INFO
level.
Change-Id: I2c870531478c05ce31cc1015597a068a4a76cf99
---
M src/common/measurement.c
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/osmo-bts refs/changes/37/5137/1
diff --git a/src/common/measurement.c b/src/common/measurement.c
index 36120c0..e4b8720 100644
--- a/src/common/measurement.c
+++ b/src/common/measurement.c
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@
irssi_sub_sum = irssi_full_sum;
}
- DEBUGP(DMEAS, "%s Computed TA(% 4dqb) BER-FULL(%2u.%02u%%),
RSSI-FULL(-%3udBm), "
+ LOGP(DMEAS, LOGL_INFO, "%s Computed TA(% 4dqb) BER-FULL(%2u.%02u%%),
RSSI-FULL(-%3udBm), "
"BER-SUB(%2u.%02u%%), RSSI-SUB(-%3udBm)\n",
gsm_lchan_name(lchan),
taqb_sum, ber_full_sum/100,
ber_full_sum%100, irssi_full_sum, ber_sub_sum/100,
ber_sub_sum%100,
@@ -349,7 +349,7 @@
mru->full.rx_qual = ber10k_to_rxqual(ber_full_sum);
mru->sub.rx_qual = ber10k_to_rxqual(ber_sub_sum);
- DEBUGP(DMEAS, "%s UL MEAS RXLEV_FULL(%u), RXLEV_SUB(%u),"
+ LOGP(DMEAS, LOGL_INFO, "%s UL MEAS RXLEV_FULL(%u), RXLEV_SUB(%u),"
"RXQUAL_FULL(%u), RXQUAL_SUB(%u), num_meas_sub(%u),
num_ul_meas(%u) \n",
gsm_lchan_name(lchan),
mru->full.rx_lev,
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/5137
To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-MessageType: newchange
Gerrit-Change-Id: I2c870531478c05ce31cc1015597a068a4a76cf99
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Harald Welte <[email protected]>
