Attention is currently required from: pespin, fixeria, dexter.
laforge has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31341 )
Change subject: pcu_l1_if_phy: flexible phy access
......................................................................
Patch Set 9:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS9:
> To me the BSC telling which phy driver to use looks really like BSC knowing
> about the PCU implementa […]
well, in the classic (12.21 based) information model, the BSC knows everything
and it spreads its knowledge to the BTSs. And in case of BTS-colocated PCU,
the BTS then passes things to the PCU (see how the NSVC are configured in
osmo-bsc.cfg). In general I also like that, as it reduces the amount of
things an operator needs to configure on each and every of their (potentially
many) remote sites.
We might also get back to fixeria's idea in the meeting today: have separte
binaries like osmo-pcu-{rbs,sysmo,...} to avoid the problem.
Many alternatives, I'm not deep enough into the topic to have a clear idea.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31341
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I8692d1bd5d137a17cf596ee2914722f419c9978d
Gerrit-Change-Number: 31341
Gerrit-PatchSet: 9
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-CC: laforge <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: dexter <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 14:18:57 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
