Attention is currently required from: falconia, pespin.

laforge has posted comments on this change. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/32110 )

Change subject: common+trx: add rtp ecu-downstream vty option
......................................................................


Patch Set 3:

(2 comments)

Commit Message:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/32110/comment/a3ff9b45_3d88dfe2
PS3, Line 9: Current osmo-bts-trx includes a provision for invoking ECUs from
           : libosmocodec in the UL path from the channel decoder to the RTP
           : output; no other models currently do likewise, but there is no
           : particular reason why this ECU invokation couldn't be moved into
           : model-independent code.
Some background knowledge: AFAIR, osmo-bts-sysmo (and hence liekly its 
relatives oc2g + lc15) already do some ECU magic in the DSP.  Then some user 
discovered that audio sounded worse on -trx than on -sysmo, and they 
implemented the "provision for invoking ECUs" in -trx [only].


Patchset:

PS1:
> > So AFAIU you are saying that your ECU is located somewhere in the CN after 
> > osmo-msc, as in some so […]
I think rather than specifying that an ECU happens somewhere "downstream" I 
think it's more logical that the osmo-bts config file specifies what osmo-bts 
itself does.  So let's rather name it in the inverse logic.  something like 
"rtp builtin-ecu" or "rtp perform-ecu" or "rtp internal-uplink-ecu" would be 
most applicable in my understanding.



--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/32110
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I0acca9c6d7da966a623287563e0789db9e0fae8e
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32110
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: falconia <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <[email protected]>
Gerrit-CC: laforge <[email protected]>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: falconia <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 12:38:51 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: falconia <[email protected]>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment

Reply via email to