Attention is currently required from: neels, pespin.

keith has posted comments on this change. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sip-connector/+/16222?usp=email )

Change subject: forward SDP between SIP and MNCC
......................................................................


Patch Set 9: Code-Review-1

(1 comment)

File src/sip.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sip-connector/+/16222/comment/18a0a1f8_2da5a8e8
PS9, Line 549:              SIPTAG_PAYLOAD_STR(sdp),
I'm slightly concerned about introducing the sending of SDP with the 180. It's 
not something I really ever see, and although some quick investigation suggests 
that UAs /should/ treat it like a 183, that is to say, we are telling the 
remote to expect early media (which come to think of it, are we? are generating 
ringback?) - I did come across a CISCO doc just now saying this behaviour is 
configurable. uf...

I'd say leave the 180 without SDP.

Actually, I just tested this, with an A leg hitting Freeswitch and the B leg 
towards osmo-sip-connector and indeed; no ringback from Freewitch as FS sees 
the SDP with the 180 and starts forwarding the media to the A leg, but nothing 
is generating ringback.



--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sip-connector/+/16222?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: osmo-sip-connector
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I3df5d06f38ee2d122706a9ebffde7db4f2bd6bae
Gerrit-Change-Number: 16222
Gerrit-PatchSet: 9
Gerrit-Owner: neels <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: keith <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: neels <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 05:02:17 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment

Reply via email to