Attention is currently required from: fixeria, laforge.

jolly has posted comments on this change. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/34886?usp=email )

Change subject: ASCI: Add control of uplink access to osmo-bts-trx
......................................................................


Patch Set 2:

(3 comments)

Commit Message:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/34886/comment/fcb66f36_4df98ba7
PS1, Line 13: Change-Id: I9045437d52984b7abe00fbc815d7f83c62c0fb5a
> `Depends: libosmocore.git Ibd6a1d468a70126a8f67e944fcb916969cc3c36b` […]
Done


File src/common/scheduler.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/34886/comment/921313b4_e155de45
PS1, Line 1153:         /* look for
> AFAIR, in this context it means both main (DCCH/TCH) and associated (SACCH) 
> channels. […]
According to GSM TS 05.02, both FACCH/SACCH can be used to send access bursts 
(uplink access or handover access).


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/34886/comment/d48a13ed_da7c4089
PS1, Line 1156: struct l1sched_ts *l1ts = lchan->ts->priv;
> This pointer can be obtained only once outside of the loop. […]
Yes, it may happen, because uplink access is activated before channel is 
activated. Just added the check here too.



--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/34886?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I9045437d52984b7abe00fbc815d7f83c62c0fb5a
Gerrit-Change-Number: 34886
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: jolly <andr...@eversberg.eu>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-CC: fixeria <vyanits...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: laforge <lafo...@osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <lafo...@osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanits...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 09:33:45 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <lafo...@osmocom.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanits...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment

Reply via email to